linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: disable per-CPU buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:35:40 -0300
From:   Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
        Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: disable per-CPU buffer_head cache for
 isolated CPUs


On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:31:26AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > 
> > Ping, apparently there is no objection to this patch...
> > 
> > Christian, what is the preferred tree for integration?
> 
> It'd be good if we could get an Ack from someone familiar with isolated
> cpus for this; or just in general from someone who can ack this.

Frederic?