linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix warnings "'pad_type' 'pad_bits' 'new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:39:02 +0800
From:   Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@....windriver.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix warnings "'pad_type' 'pad_bits' 'new_off' may
 be used uninitialized"


On 7/27/23 19:01, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:25:36PM +0800, Xiangyu Chen wrote:
>> From: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@...driver.com>
>>
>> When turn on the yocto DEBUG_BUILD flag, the build options for gcc would enable maybe-uninitialized,
>> and following warnings would be reported as below:
> curious, what's the gcc version? I can't reproduce that,

Indeed, it's also strange to me, the compiler using gcc-11.3.0 which is 
generated by yocto 4.2.2(mickledore branch).

The warning happens on turn on DEBUG_BUILD flag in yocto configuration, 
but when disable the DEBUG_BUILD flag, this

warning disappeared.

I have compared w/wo the DEBUG_BUILD's kernel build parameters this 
morning, when enabled the flag, the kernel build

parameters as normal, the warning won't happen. When I enabled the 
DEBUG_BUILD, the cflags with -Og -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types

seems the debug cflags caused the false warning behavior.


> and we already have all warnings enabled:
>
>    CFLAGS += -Werror -Wall
>
> they seem like false warnings also, because ARRAY_SIZE(pads)
> will be always > 0
>
> jirka
>
>> | btf_dump.c: In function 'btf_dump_emit_bit_padding':
>> | btf_dump.c:916:4: error: 'pad_type' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> |   916 |    btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s: %d;", pfx(lvl), pad_type,
>> |       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> |   917 |      in_bitfield ? new_off - cur_off : 0);
>> |       |      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | btf_dump.c:929:6: error: 'pad_bits' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> |   929 |   if (bits == pad_bits) {
>> |       |      ^
>> | btf_dump.c:913:28: error: 'new_off' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> |   913 |       (new_off == next_off && roundup(cur_off, next_align * 8) != new_off) ||
>> |       |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> |   HOSTLD  scripts/mod/modpost
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@...driver.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
>> index 4d9f30bf7f01..79923c3b8777 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
>> @@ -867,8 +867,8 @@ static void btf_dump_emit_bit_padding(const struct btf_dump *d,
>>        } pads[] = {
>>                {"long", d->ptr_sz * 8}, {"int", 32}, {"short", 16}, {"char", 8}
>>        };
>> -     int new_off, pad_bits, bits, i;
>> -     const char *pad_type;
>> +     int new_off = 0, pad_bits = 0, bits, i;
>> +     const char *pad_type = NULL;
>>
>>        if (cur_off >= next_off)
>>                return; /* no gap */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>