linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH blktests v1 00/11] Switch to allowed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:59:54 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To:     Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc:     "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 00/11] Switch to allowed_host

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 08:20:55AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > Except the last two patches are just refactoring patches. So if we decide to use
> > common target setup/cleanup helpers, I think we could add them before the last
> > two patches, which would make the last patch way smaller.
> 
> I ran 'make check' and saw shellecheck complaints below. I added 'export' to the
> variables then they disappeared.
> 
> tests/nvme/rc:19:1: warning: def_subsysnqn appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally). [SC2034]
> tests/nvme/rc:20:1: warning: def_file_path appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally). [SC2034]
> tests/nvme/rc:21:1: warning: def_file_path appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally). [SC2034]

These variables are not used in nvme/rc at the point I introduce them. Only in
the tests. I could add the nvmet setup/cleanup helpers with the variables which
would make those warnings go away. But these helpers would then add the end of
the series. Also not really good. I don't what is best here.

> I also ran nvme tests with the export fixes and saw no regression. Looks good
> from test run point of view.

Thanks!

BTW, I am off next week, so I don't think I send soon an update.