linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: More explicit DT include clean-ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZMOO/AIP25sxRXHY@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:48:44 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: More explicit DT include clean-ups

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:20:39PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> A couple more clean-ups in the MIPS code.
> 
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it was merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> I've now built all MIPS defconfigs in my tree which removes the implicit
> includes. So I found a few more fixes. This can be squashed into the
> previous commit if desired.
> ---
>  arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c | 2 ++
>  arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c      | 2 ++
>  arch/mips/ralink/ill_acc.c                | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]