[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496c14de-1e02-66f6-37d1-90713c2f6742@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:41:18 -0700
From: Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>
To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <quic_shashim@...cinc.com>, <quic_kaushalk@...cinc.com>,
<quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
<quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>, <kernel@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM4450 QRD DTS
On 7/27/2023 5:49 PM, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>
>
> 在 7/27/2023 9:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
>> On 27.07.2023 10:49, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 7/27/2023 3:59 PM, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
>>>> On 27.07.2023 08:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 27/07/2023 04:35, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>>> Add DTS for Qualcomm QRD platform which uses SM4450 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4450-qrd.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4450-qrd.dts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>>>>>> index 337abc4ceb17..db805d0929c8 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) +=
>>>>>> sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm850-samsung-w737.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdx75-idp.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb
>>>>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm4450-qrd.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm6115-fxtec-pro1x.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm6115p-lenovo-j606f.dtb
>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dtb
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4450-qrd.dts
>>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4450-qrd.dts
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..04ad1dd4285a
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4450-qrd.dts
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All
>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "sm4450.dtsi"
>>>>>> +/ {
>>>>>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM4450 QRD";
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm4450-qrd", "qcom,sm4450";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + aliases { };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + chosen {
>>>>>> + bootargs = "console=hvc0 earlycon=hvc0 hvc_dcc.enable=1
>>>>>> cpuidle.off=1";
>>>>>
>>>>> No earlycon, no hvc.enable (there is no such parameter), no
>>>>> cpuidle.off
>>>>> (again don't add fake stuff). So the only suitable argument is
>>>>> console,
>>>>> but this should be actually used via stdout path, although it seems
>>>>> there is no device node for such usage?
>>>> hvc totally comes from Qualcomm downstream and all the Gunyah
>>>> shenanigans..
>>>>
>>>> Tengfei, please ensure the patches are tested against linux-next
>>>> with no additional changes or modules, with a clean Linux userspace
>>>> (or at least a ramdisk).
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>> Hi Konrad,
>>> All these patches are tesed on linux-next, and get DCC console.
>>> For support this test, I did a temporal for enable
>>> CONFIG_HVC_DCC(this change haven't push to upstream).
>> So what you've said is that you've not tested against linux-next +
>> this patchset.
>>
>> You're supposed to `git checkout linux-next/master && (pick the series
>> you're sending)` and test just that. No less, no more. Preferably with
>> the upstream arm64 defconfig.
>>
>> Konrad
> Hi Konrad,
> Sorry, my explain isn't enough before.
>
> My tested against linux-next + this patchset, all my test code from
> upstream linux-next, haven't downstream code related.
>
> About the temporal patch which enable CONFIG_HVC_DCC, because we haven't
> enable uart, so I enable CONFIG_HVC_DCC for verify if we can get DCC
> console through "make ARCH=arm64 menuconfig" on linux-next/master, but
> this patchset haven't contain this enable CONFIG_HVC_DCC patch, because
> upstream seems don't want to enable CONFIG_HVC_DCC defaultly.
>
> Besides these, I all do dtbs_check and checkpatch.pl check, all these
> check passed.
CONFIG_HVC_DCC is at upstream. It is not necessary to have UART to test
the kernel w/ the console.
One can boot the kernel w/ JTAG console too. This will allow us to
submit the patches without submitting the UART / clocks dependencies.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
--
---Trilok Soni
Powered by blists - more mailing lists