[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb6330ef-5e74-01a4-a418-0b33748932ff@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:58:01 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] page_pool: split types and declarations from
page_pool.h
On 2023/7/27 22:43, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d0553ad37865..30037d39b82d 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -16015,8 +16015,7 @@ M: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> S: Supported
> F: Documentation/networking/page_pool.rst
> -F: include/net/page_pool.h
> -F: include/trace/events/page_pool.h
Is there any reason to remove the above?
> +F: include/net/page_pool/*.h
It seems more common to use 'include/net/page_pool/' in
MAINTAINERS.
> F: net/core/page_pool.c
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists