lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:40:52 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        richard.genoud@...il.com, radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/50] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add
 compatible for sam9x7

On 28/07/2023 12:27, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add sam9x7 compatible to DT bindings documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml     | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> index 30b2131b5860..42644d0f1104 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
>            - atmel,at91rm9200-usart
>            - atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>            - microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +          - microchip,sam9x7-usart

This looks wrong. Conflicts with further entry.

>        - items:
>            - const: atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu
>            - const: atmel,at91rm9200-usart
> @@ -28,6 +29,14 @@ properties:
>            - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7-usart
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart

So is it or is it not compatible with at91sam9260?



Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ