[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230729013535.1070024-18-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:35:23 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 17/29] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection
on to-be-deleted slot
When handling a slot "flush", don't call back into KVM to drop write
protection for gfns in the slot. Now that KVM rejects attempts to move
memory slots while KVMGT is attached, the only time a slot is "flushed"
is when it's being removed, i.e. the memslot and all its write-tracking
metadata is about to be deleted.
Reviewed-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index e9276500435d..3ea3cb9eb599 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1630,14 +1630,8 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
- if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn)) {
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn,
- KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
+ if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
- }
}
mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
}
--
2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists