| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230729013535.1070024-25-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:35:30 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 24/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the
new reality
Rename the page-track APIs to capture that they're all about tracking
writes, now that the facade of supporting multiple modes is gone.
Opportunstically replace "slot" with "gfn" in anticipation of removing
the @slot param from the external APIs.
No functional change intended.
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 21 +++++++++------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 9e4ee26d1779..f5c1db36cdb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
#include <linux/kvm_types.h>
-void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
-void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ gfn_t gfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index b8dce17bffdc..a0309fde3549 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
/* the non-leaf shadow pages are keeping readonly. */
if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
- return kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+ return kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
- return kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+ return kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
}
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
* track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages,
* i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below!
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn))
+ if (kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(kvm, slot, gfn))
return -EPERM;
/*
@@ -4231,7 +4231,7 @@ static bool page_fault_handle_page_track(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* guest is writing the page which is write tracked which can
* not be fixed by page fault handler.
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn))
+ if (kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn))
return true;
return false;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index cdc6069b8caf..b835ba7f325c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -84,10 +84,9 @@ static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
*/
-void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ gfn_t gfn)
{
-
if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
return;
@@ -102,12 +101,11 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K))
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn);
/*
* remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
- * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
- * kvm_slot_page_track_add_page().
+ * of corresponding access on that page.
*
* It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
* or kvm->slots_lock.
@@ -116,8 +114,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
*/
-void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
{
if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
return;
@@ -130,14 +128,13 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
*/
kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_remove_gfn);
/*
* check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
*/
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- gfn_t gfn)
+bool kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
{
int index;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
index 789d0c479519..50d3278e8c69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
unsigned long npages);
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+bool kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index e71182b8a3f2..05a7e614ead0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+ kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
@@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+ kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
--
2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists