| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202307291024.DHfPmyN4-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 11:03:08 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF"
inside devtree_lock
Hi Rob,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5-rc3 next-20230728]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rob-Herring/of-dynamic-Refactor-action-prints-to-not-use-pOF-inside-devtree_lock/20230729-072155
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728231950.1619073-1-robh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3] of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF" inside devtree_lock
config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307291024.DHfPmyN4-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307291024.DHfPmyN4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307291024.DHfPmyN4-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/of/dynamic.c:74:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'of_changeset_action_print' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
74 | void of_changeset_action_print(unsigned long action, struct device_node *np, const char *prop_name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:564,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/loongarch/include/asm/bug.h:59,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:13,
from include/asm-generic/current.h:5,
from ./arch/loongarch/include/generated/asm/current.h:1,
from include/linux/mutex.h:14,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from drivers/of/dynamic.c:12:
drivers/of/dynamic.c: In function 'of_reconfig_notify':
>> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:219:58: error: expected expression before 'do'
219 | #define __dynamic_func_call_cls(id, cls, fmt, func, ...) do { \
| ^~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:246:9: note: in expansion of macro '__dynamic_func_call_cls'
246 | __dynamic_func_call_cls(__UNIQUE_ID(ddebug), cls, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:248:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call_cls'
248 | _dynamic_func_call_cls(_DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:267:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call'
267 | _dynamic_func_call(fmt, __dynamic_pr_debug, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:579:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_pr_debug'
579 | dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/of/dynamic.c:87:13: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_debug'
87 | if (pr_debug("notify "))
| ^~~~~~~~
drivers/of/dynamic.c: In function '__of_changeset_entry_apply':
>> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:219:58: error: expected expression before 'do'
219 | #define __dynamic_func_call_cls(id, cls, fmt, func, ...) do { \
| ^~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:246:9: note: in expansion of macro '__dynamic_func_call_cls'
246 | __dynamic_func_call_cls(__UNIQUE_ID(ddebug), cls, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:248:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call_cls'
248 | _dynamic_func_call_cls(_DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:267:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call'
267 | _dynamic_func_call(fmt, __dynamic_pr_debug, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:579:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_pr_debug'
579 | dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/of/dynamic.c:571:13: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_debug'
571 | if (pr_debug("changeset: applying: cset<%p> ", ce))
| ^~~~~~~~
vim +/of_changeset_action_print +74 drivers/of/dynamic.c
73
> 74 void of_changeset_action_print(unsigned long action, struct device_node *np, const char *prop_name)
75 {
76 if (prop_name)
77 pr_cont("%-15s %pOF:%s\n", action_names[action], np, prop_name);
78 else
79 pr_cont("%-15s %pOF\n", action_names[action], np);
80 }
81
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists