[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230729064233.GE1901145@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 09:42:33 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
liangma@...ngbit.com, simon.evans@...edance.com,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [v1 3/6] memblock: add parameter to memblock_setclr_flag for
selecting memblock_type
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
> This is in preparation for setting flags (for e.g. to not initialize
> struct pages) on reserved memory region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index f9e61e565a53..4fd431d16ef2 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -897,11 +897,16 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> */
> static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base,
> - phys_addr_t size, int set, int flag)
> + phys_addr_t size, int set, int flag, bool reserved)
> {
Please pass struct memblock_type * as the first parameter and set the flags
unconditionally.
The boolean parameters make code less readable. Besides if we'll add more
flags for reserved regions it'll become really hairy.
> - struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
> + struct memblock_type *type;
> int i, ret, start_rgn, end_rgn;
>
> + if (reserved)
> + type = &memblock.reserved;
> + else
> + type = &memblock.memory;
> +
> ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, base, size, &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -928,7 +933,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base,
> */
> int __init_memblock memblock_mark_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG);
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -940,7 +945,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_mark_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> */
> int __init_memblock memblock_clear_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG);
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -957,7 +962,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>
> system_has_some_mirror = true;
>
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_MIRROR);
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_MIRROR, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -977,7 +982,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> */
> int __init_memblock memblock_mark_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP);
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -989,7 +994,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_mark_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> */
> int __init_memblock memblock_clear_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> - return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP);
> + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP, 0);
> }
>
> static bool should_skip_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists