[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96bdb44d-3c59-b6e7-7baa-0ab80efeb720@arinc9.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:08:55 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: dts: ralink: reorder MT7621 clocks in Ethernet
block
On 29.07.2023 14:04, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").
>
> This fixes:
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@...00000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@...00000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
>
> Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
I'm not sure if I should agree with this patch. The relevant parts of
the schema for mediatek,mt7621-eth were added way later than the
existing bindings on mt7621.dtsi. Why don't we address this on the
schema along with a bunch of other issues the patch for
mediatek,mt7621-eth brought?
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists