linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230729193312.GA2844869@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:33:12 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     孙冉 <sunran001@...suo.com>,
        airlied <airlied@...il.com>, daniel <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "alexander.deucher" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        amd-gfx <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of
 'unsigned'

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 09:12:05PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:35:19PM +0800, 孙冉 wrote:
> > WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
> 
> Your From: address != SoB identity

While the comment below is a completely valid complaint, I think this
comment is being rather pedantic. Google Translate will tell you that
孙冉 is Sun Ran, so while the name does not strictly match, it is
clearly the same...

> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > index 39cc87a59a9a..9b55a7103cfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >   *
> >   * Returns corresponding domain of the ttm mem_type
> >   */
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_mem_type_to_domain(u32 mem_type)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_mem_type_to_domain(u32 mem_type)
> >  {
> >   switch (mem_type) {
> >   case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> > @@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >   return bo->tbo.base.size;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_bo_ngpu_pages(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_bo_ngpu_pages(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >  {
> >   return bo->tbo.base.size / RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_bo_gpu_page_alignment(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_bo_gpu_page_alignment(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >  {
> >   return (bo->tbo.page_alignment << PAGE_SHIFT) / RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline void *radeon_sa_bo_cpu_addr(struct drm_suballoc *sa_bo)
> >  
> >  extern int radeon_sa_bo_manager_init(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> >           struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager,
> > -         unsigned size, u32 align, u32 domain,
> > +         unsigned int size, u32 align, u32 domain,
> >           u32 flags);
> >  extern void radeon_sa_bo_manager_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> >            struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager);
> 
> The patch is whitespace-corrupted. Use git-send-email(1) to submit patches.
> Also, your patch is also MIME-encoded, hence the corruption.
> 
> To Alex: Please don't apply this patch due to reasons above.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara