linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Replace s1_cfg with ctx_desc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Jul 2023 19:24:28 +0800
From:   Michael Shavit <mshavit@...gle.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, jean-philippe@...aro.org,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Replace s1_cfg with ctx_desc_cfg

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
> > Still, it would be odd to have "cdcfg" and "cd_table" at the same
> > time. If we have to be conservative, perhaps we should just align
> > with the old naming: "struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cdcfg;"...
>
> Yeah, I think changing to cd_table in the places touched makes alot of
> sense

A bit confused by the "Yeah" reply given the quote... Are we ok
keeping the v1 version of this patch w.r.t. to cd_table/cdcfg and
struct naming?