[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <808c7eb4-abc6-21c9-f929-7070c0da1d05@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:04:26 -0300
From: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: upgrade to Rust 1.71.0
On 7/29/23 19:03, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> This is the second upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.68.2 to 1.71.0
> (i.e. the latest).
>
> See the upgrade policy [1] and the comments on the first upgrade in
> commit 3ed03f4da06e ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").
>
> # Unstable features
>
> No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized.
>
> Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside
> the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be
> upstreamed may increase the list.
>
> Please see [2] for details.
>
> # Required changes
>
> For the upgrade, this patch requires the following changes:
>
> - Removal of the `__rust_*` allocator functions, together with
> the addition of the `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` static.
> See [3] for details.
>
> - Some more compiler builtins added due to `<f{32,64}>::midpoint()`
> that got added in Rust 1.71 [4].
>
> # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing
>
> The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded
> at once.
>
> There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from
> upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates
> needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer
> infallible APIs coming from upstream.
>
> Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative
> approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and
> the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only,
> especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match
> the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream.
>
> Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in
> the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot
> potentially unintended changes to our additions.
>
> To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following
> to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream
> Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after
> applying this patch:
>
> # Get the difference with respect to the old version.
> git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
> git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
> cut -d/ -f3- |
> grep -Fv README.md |
> xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
> git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch
> git -C linux restore rust/alloc
>
> # Apply this patch.
> git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch
>
> # Get the difference with respect to the new version.
> git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
> git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
> cut -d/ -f3- |
> grep -Fv README.md |
> xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
> git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch
> git -C linux restore rust/alloc
>
> Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first
> approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second
> approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended.
>
> Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [1]
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [2]
> Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86844 [3]
> Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92048 [4]
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> ---
> Based on top of `rust-next`, since we want to be on top of commit
> 7c74839b2acc ("rust: alloc: Add realloc and alloc_zeroed to the
> GlobalAlloc impl"), in order to be able to simply remove the `__rust_*`
> functions here.
>
> [...]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists