lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230730194026.GA19962@wunner.de>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jul 2023 21:40:26 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        vsethi@...dia.com, kthota@...dia.com, mmaddireddy@...dia.com,
        sagar.tv@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] PCI: pciehp: Disable ACS Source Validation during
 hot-remove

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:45:19AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> PCIe 6.0, 6.12.1.1 specifies that downstream devices are permitted to
> send upstream messages before they have been assigned a bus number and
> such messages have a Requester ID with Bus number set to 00h.
> If the Downstream port has ACS Source Validation enabled, these messages
> will be detected as ACS violation error.
> 
> Hence, disable ACS Source Validation in the bridge device during
> hot-remove operation and re-enable it after enumeration of the
> downstream hierarchy but before binding the respective device drivers.

What are these messages that are sent before assignment of a bus number?

What's the user-visible issue that occurs when they're blocked?

Doesn't disabling Source Validation introduce a security hole because the
device may spoof messages before Source Validation is re-enabled?

PCIe r6.1 sec 6.12.1.1 does indeed point out that the downstream device
is *permitted* to send these messages but the Implementation Note
does *not* prescribe that Source Validation shall be disabled to let them
through.  It merely points out that the messages may be filtered if
Source Validation is enabled.

Thanks,

Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ