linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] remoteproc: qcom: Add Hexagon based multipd rproc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:34:19 +0530
From:   Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] remoteproc: qcom: Add Hexagon based multipd
 rproc driver



On 7/28/2023 1:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/07/2023 08:34, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>> +
>> +static int q6_get_inbound_irq(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6,
>> +			      struct platform_device *pdev,
>> +			      const char *int_name,
>> +			      int index, int *pirq,
>> +			      irqreturn_t (*handler)(int irq, void *data))
>> +{
>> +	int ret, irq;
>> +	char *interrupt, *tmp = (char *)int_name;
>> +	struct q6_wcss *wcss = q6->rproc->priv;
>> +
>> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, index);
>> +	if (irq < 0) {
>> +		if (irq != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> 
> Still not good... I think I am saying this the third time: drop this
> eprobe defer dance. It is not needed. Just open the definition of
> dev_err_probe().
> 
Yeah, somehow it's missed. I will drop.

Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.

>> +			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, irq,
>> +					     "failed to retrieve %s IRQ: %d\n",
>> +					     int_name, irq);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>