[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023073135-puppy-reflected-700d@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:53:10 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
isaac.true@...onical.com, jesse.sung@...onical.com,
l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com, tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] serial: sc16is7xx: remove obsolete out_thread
label
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:23:35AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
>
> Commit c8f71b49ee4d ("serial: sc16is7xx: setup GPIO controller later
> in probe") moved GPIO setup code later in probe function. Doing so
> also required to move ports cleanup code (out_ports label) after the
> GPIO cleanup code.
>
> After these moves, the out_thread label becomes misplaced and makes
> part of the cleanup code illogical.
>
> This patch remove the now obsolete out_thread label and make GPIO
> setup code jump to out_ports label if it fails.
>
> Fixes: c8f71b49ee4d ("serial: sc16is7xx: setup GPIO controller later in probe")
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>
> Tested-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Why is this not ok for stable kernels yet it has a Fixes: tag?
Please fix.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists