[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kuctj2p353nsae24lrhcymqqpfajbc7qoqly63zpwvdp6lgu3b@kk4gpzsapxnn>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 19:03:07 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@...il.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
hsinyi@...gle.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled
in drm_panel
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:33:22AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> In my case a few different panel drivers disable the regulators in the
> unprepare/disable routines.
And that's totally fine.
> For at least the Rockchip DSI implementations for some reason the
> panel gets unprepared more than once, which triggers an unbalanced
> regulator disable.
"For some reason" being that DW-DSI apparently finds it ok to bypass any
kind of abstraction and randomly calling panel functions by itself:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4.7/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c#L868
It looks like it's fixed it current drm-misc-next though.
> Obviously though the correct course of action is to fix the reason why
> the panel is disabled more than once, but that's at least the root
> cause of this behavior on the few panels I've worked with.
Like I said we already have a commit on the way to fix that, so it
shouldn't be an issue anymore.
I stand by what I was saying earlier though, I think it's mostly
cargo-cult or drivers being very wrong. If anything, the DW-DSI stuff
made me even more convinced that we shouldn't even entertain that idea
:)
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists