[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f10f06d4-9c82-41d3-a62a-09c62f254cfc@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:21:32 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] fs/proc/kcore: avoid bounce buffer for ktext data
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 08:23:55AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > I met this too when I executed below command to trigger a kcore reading.
> > I wanted to do a simple testing during system running and got this.
> >
> > makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore
> >
> > Later I tried your above objdump testing, it corrupted system too.
> >
>
> What do you mean with "corrupted system too" -- did it not only fail to
> dump the system, but also actually harmed the system?
>
> @Lorenzo do you plan on reproduce + fix, or should we consider reverting
> that change?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
Apologies I mised this, I have been very busy lately not least with book :)
Concerning, I will take a look as I get a chance. I think the whole series
would have to be reverted which would be... depressing... as other patches
in series eliminates the bounce buffer altogether.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists