lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:25:13 -0700
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     levymitchell0@...il.com
Cc:     "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mikelly@...rosoft.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_balloon: Update the balloon driver to use the SBRM API

Hi Mitchell,

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:23:31AM +0000, Mitchell Levy via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>
> 
> 
> 
> ---

I don't know whether it's a tool issue or something else, but all words
after the "---" line in the email will be discarded from a commit log.
You can try to apply this patch yourself and see the result:

	b4 shazam 20230726-master-v1-1-b2ce6a4538db@...il.com 

> This patch is intended as a proof-of-concept for the new SBRM
> machinery[1]. For some brief background, the idea behind SBRM is using
> the __cleanup__ attribute to automatically unlock locks (or otherwise
> release resources) when they go out of scope, similar to C++ style RAII.
> This promises some benefits such as making code simpler (particularly
> where you have lots of goto fail; type constructs) as well as reducing
> the surface area for certain kinds of bugs.
> 
> The changes in this patch should not result in any difference in how the
> code actually runs (i.e., it's purely an exercise in this new syntax
> sugar). In one instance SBRM was not appropriate, so I left that part
> alone, but all other locking/unlocking is handled automatically in this
> patch.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230626125726.GU4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [1]
> 
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: "Mitchell Levy (Microsoft)" <levymitchell0@...il.com>

Beside the above format issue, the code looks good to me, nice job!

Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>

Regards,
Boqun

> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> index dffcc894f117..2812601e84da 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>  
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>  #include <linux/mman.h>
> @@ -646,7 +647,7 @@ static int hv_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  			      void *v)
>  {
>  	struct memory_notify *mem = (struct memory_notify *)v;
> -	unsigned long flags, pfn_count;
> +	unsigned long pfn_count;
>  
>  	switch (val) {
>  	case MEM_ONLINE:
> @@ -655,21 +656,22 @@ static int hv_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  		break;
>  
>  	case MEM_OFFLINE:
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> -		pfn_count = hv_page_offline_check(mem->start_pfn,
> -						  mem->nr_pages);
> -		if (pfn_count <= dm_device.num_pages_onlined) {
> -			dm_device.num_pages_onlined -= pfn_count;
> -		} else {
> -			/*
> -			 * We're offlining more pages than we managed to online.
> -			 * This is unexpected. In any case don't let
> -			 * num_pages_onlined wrap around zero.
> -			 */
> -			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> -			dm_device.num_pages_onlined = 0;
> +		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &dm_device.ha_lock) {
> +			pfn_count = hv_page_offline_check(mem->start_pfn,
> +							  mem->nr_pages);
> +			if (pfn_count <= dm_device.num_pages_onlined) {
> +				dm_device.num_pages_onlined -= pfn_count;
> +			} else {
> +				/*
> +				 * We're offlining more pages than we
> +				 * managed to online. This is
> +				 * unexpected. In any case don't let
> +				 * num_pages_onlined wrap around zero.
> +				 */
> +				WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +				dm_device.num_pages_onlined = 0;
> +			}
>  		}
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
>  		break;
>  	case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
>  	case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
> @@ -721,24 +723,23 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
>  	unsigned long start_pfn;
>  	unsigned long processed_pfn;
>  	unsigned long total_pfn = pfn_count;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < (size/HA_CHUNK); i++) {
>  		start_pfn = start + (i * HA_CHUNK);
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> -		has->ha_end_pfn +=  HA_CHUNK;
> +		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &dm_device.ha_lock) {
> +			has->ha_end_pfn +=  HA_CHUNK;
>  
> -		if (total_pfn > HA_CHUNK) {
> -			processed_pfn = HA_CHUNK;
> -			total_pfn -= HA_CHUNK;
> -		} else {
> -			processed_pfn = total_pfn;
> -			total_pfn = 0;
> -		}
> +			if (total_pfn > HA_CHUNK) {
> +				processed_pfn = HA_CHUNK;
> +				total_pfn -= HA_CHUNK;
> +			} else {
> +				processed_pfn = total_pfn;
> +				total_pfn = 0;
> +			}
>  
> -		has->covered_end_pfn +=  processed_pfn;
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +			has->covered_end_pfn +=  processed_pfn;
> +		}
>  
>  		reinit_completion(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
>  
> @@ -758,10 +759,10 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
>  				 */
>  				do_hot_add = false;
>  			}
> -			spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> -			has->ha_end_pfn -= HA_CHUNK;
> -			has->covered_end_pfn -=  processed_pfn;
> -			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +			scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &dm_device.ha_lock) {
> +				has->ha_end_pfn -= HA_CHUNK;
> +				has->covered_end_pfn -=  processed_pfn;
> +			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -781,10 +782,9 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
>  static void hv_online_page(struct page *pg, unsigned int order)
>  {
>  	struct hv_hotadd_state *has;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(pg);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&dm_device.ha_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(has, &dm_device.ha_region_list, list) {
>  		/* The page belongs to a different HAS. */
>  		if ((pfn < has->start_pfn) ||
> @@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ static void hv_online_page(struct page *pg, unsigned int order)
>  		hv_bring_pgs_online(has, pfn, 1UL << order);
>  		break;
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static int pfn_covered(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long pfn_cnt)
> @@ -803,9 +802,8 @@ static int pfn_covered(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long pfn_cnt)
>  	struct hv_hotadd_gap *gap;
>  	unsigned long residual, new_inc;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&dm_device.ha_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(has, &dm_device.ha_region_list, list) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If the pfn range we are dealing with is not in the current
> @@ -852,7 +850,6 @@ static int pfn_covered(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long pfn_cnt)
>  		ret = 1;
>  		break;
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -947,7 +944,6 @@ static unsigned long process_hot_add(unsigned long pg_start,
>  {
>  	struct hv_hotadd_state *ha_region = NULL;
>  	int covered;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (pfn_cnt == 0)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -979,9 +975,9 @@ static unsigned long process_hot_add(unsigned long pg_start,
>  		ha_region->covered_end_pfn = pg_start;
>  		ha_region->end_pfn = rg_start + rg_size;
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> -		list_add_tail(&ha_region->list, &dm_device.ha_region_list);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &dm_device.ha_lock) {
> +			list_add_tail(&ha_region->list, &dm_device.ha_region_list);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  do_pg_range:
> @@ -2047,7 +2043,6 @@ static void balloon_remove(struct hv_device *dev)
>  	struct hv_dynmem_device *dm = hv_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct hv_hotadd_state *has, *tmp;
>  	struct hv_hotadd_gap *gap, *tmp_gap;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (dm->num_pages_ballooned != 0)
>  		pr_warn("Ballooned pages: %d\n", dm->num_pages_ballooned);
> @@ -2073,7 +2068,7 @@ static void balloon_remove(struct hv_device *dev)
>  #endif
>  	}
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&dm_device.ha_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(has, tmp, &dm->ha_region_list, list) {
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(gap, tmp_gap, &has->gap_list, list) {
>  			list_del(&gap->list);
> @@ -2082,7 +2077,6 @@ static void balloon_remove(struct hv_device *dev)
>  		list_del(&has->list);
>  		kfree(has);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static int balloon_suspend(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 3f01e9fed8454dcd89727016c3e5b2fbb8f8e50c
> change-id: 20230725-master-bbcd9205758b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ