[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc3974f0-500c-b7d3-c8ca-df069dbd02a8@ics.forth.gr>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 02:35:20 +0300
From: Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>
To: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Cc: Tomasz Jeznach <tjeznach@...osinc.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux@...osinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sebastien Boeuf <seb@...osinc.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] RISC-V: drivers/iommu/riscv: Add command, fault,
page-req queues
On 7/31/23 16:15, Zong Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:32 PM Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/29/23 15:58, Zong Li wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:34 AM Tomasz Jeznach <tjeznach@...osinc.com> wrote:
>>>> + iommu->cap = riscv_iommu_readq(iommu, RISCV_IOMMU_REG_CAP);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* For now we only support WSIs until we have AIA support */
>>>
>>> I'm not completely understand AIA support here, because I saw the pci
>>> case uses the MSI, and kernel seems to have the AIA implementation.
>>> Could you please elaborate it?
>>>
>>
>> When I wrote this we didn't have AIA in the kernel, and without IMSIC we
>> can't have MSIs in the hart (we can still have MSIs in the PCIe controller).
>
> Thanks for your clarification, do we support the MSI in next version?
>
I don't think there is an IOMMU implementation out there (emulated or in
hw) that can do MSIs and is not a pcie device (the QEMU implementation
is a pcie device). If we have something to test this against, and we
also have an IMSIC etc, we can work on that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists