[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0617841a-5d1f-b703-daa9-fedba148a05d@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:54:24 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org
Cc: helgaas@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_ramkri@...cinc.com,
quic_parass@...cinc.com,
"reviewer:ARM/QUALCOMM CHROMEBOOK SUPPORT"
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe0 node
On 31/07/2023 07:29, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>
> On 7/28/2023 9:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2023 17:10, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>> On 7/28/2023 5:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 28/07/2023 12:39, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
>>>>> Add PCIe dtsi node for PCIe0 controller on sc7280 platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
>>>> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + pcie0_phy: phy@...6000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8250-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
>>>>> + reg = <0 0x01c06000 0 0x1c0>;
>>>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>> + ranges;
>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_AUX_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_CLKREF_EN>,
>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref", "refgen";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "phy";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>;
>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pcie0_lane: phy@...e6200 {
>>>> Isn't this old-style of bindings? Wasn't there a change? On what tree
>>>> did you base it?
>> The work was here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230324022514.1800382-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/
>>
>> But I don't remember the status.
>>
>>> Let me rebase and send it again.
>> This anyway looks like wrong compatible. You used sm8250.
>
> The patch was send on latest linux-next only and the above change is not
> merged yet.
I don't think we will want old DTS syntax... but this actually depends
on the status of Dmitry's patchset.
>
> We are using the same compatible string as sm8250 because the phy is
> same both from hardware and software perspective for sm8250.
>
> that is why we are using the same compatible string.
>
> Can you let me know if we want create a separate compatible string for
> this even though we are using same phy?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#42
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists