[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ca1922a-5d21-2c00-7514-6f90a9d2cb03@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:01:41 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8996: Use read-only RCG ops for RPM
bus clocks
On 13.06.2023 19:54, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 13.06.2023 19:56, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:22:48AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> The config/periph/system NoC clocks are wholly controlled by the
>>> RPM firmware and Linux should never ever alter their configuration.
>>>
>>
>> Does Linux need to know about them?
> Not really, but it allows us to get rates of their children.
>
> We can get rid of them if one can argue debugcc is enough. Unless
> we need clk_get_rate for some reason.
>
Any opinions?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists