lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:28:42 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/22] x86/decompressor: Use standard calling
 convention for trampoline

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Update the trampoline code so its arguments are passed via RDI and RSI,
> which matches the ordinary SysV calling convention for x86_64. This will
> allow this code to be called directly from C.
> 
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S | 26 +++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/pgtable.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> index 1892679be2b6897a..491d985be75fd5b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> @@ -443,9 +443,9 @@ SYM_CODE_START(startup_64)
>  	movq	%r15, %rdi		/* pass struct boot_params pointer */
>  	call	paging_prepare
>  
> -	/* Save the trampoline address in RCX */
> -	movq	%rax, %rcx
> -
> +	/* Pass the trampoline address and boolean flag as args #1 and #2 */
> +	movq	%rax, %rdi
> +	movq	%rdx, %rsi
>  	leaq	TRAMPOLINE_32BIT_CODE_OFFSET(%rax), %rax
>  	call	*%rax
>  
> @@ -534,15 +534,15 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(.Lrelocated)
>  /*
>   * This is the 32-bit trampoline that will be copied over to low memory.
>   *
> - * ECX contains the base address of the trampoline memory.
> - * Non zero RDX means trampoline needs to enable 5-level paging.
> + * EDI contains the base address of the trampoline memory.
> + * Non-zero ESI means trampoline needs to enable 5-level paging.
>   */

This is confusing - this talks about 32-bit and 32-bit registers but
uses the 64-bit calling convention because it gets called by 64-bit
code. Please add a short sentence clarifying that.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ