[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230731-tribute-splashing-6a90f443cefe@wendy>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 12:38:37 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: nonstandard cache
operations support
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:30:43PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > +config RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS
> > > + bool
> > > + depends on RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > > + help
> > > + This enables function pointer support for non-standard noncoherent
> > > + systems to handle cache management.
> >
> > Per Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst:
> >
> > "we'll only consider patches for extensions that either:
> >
> > - Have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation, or
> > - Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard
> > Linux practice."
> >
> > I'm not sure which item this patch series belongs to.
> >
> Maybe Conor can help me here ;)
I'm not entirely sure why you need my help, it's your company that
manufactures the SoC that needs this after all.. I think Emil already
pointed out that it was the latter of the two. I guess it is not an
"extension" in the strictest sense of the word, but it fills the same
gap as one, so /shrug.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists