[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230801145111.GF26253@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:51:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform
device for TRBE
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>
> #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists