linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND] fs/befs: fix shift-out-of-bounds in befs_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230801155823.206985-1-ghandatmanas@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue,  1 Aug 2023 21:28:23 +0530
From:   Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@...il.com>
To:     salah.triki@...il.com, luisbg@...nel.org
Cc:     Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzbot+fc26c366038b54261e53@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] fs/befs: fix shift-out-of-bounds in befs_check_sb

The consistency check for the block_size by using the block_shift caused
integer overflow. Thus a max limit to the block_shift was defined named
BEFS_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT in befs.h. Also check for the block_shift was added
so that overflow does not occur.

Reported-by: syzbot+fc26c366038b54261e53@...kaller.appspotmail.com

Signed-off-by: Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@...il.com>
---
 fs/befs/befs.h  |  2 +-
 fs/befs/super.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/befs/befs.h b/fs/befs/befs.h
index 7cd47245694d..5490024adb33 100644
--- a/fs/befs/befs.h
+++ b/fs/befs/befs.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 
 /* used in debug.c */
 #define BEFS_VERSION "0.9.3"
-
+#define BEFS_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT 31
 
 typedef u64 befs_blocknr_t;
 /*
diff --git a/fs/befs/super.c b/fs/befs/super.c
index 7c50025c99d8..f2aeb2ed6e77 100644
--- a/fs/befs/super.c
+++ b/fs/befs/super.c
@@ -88,6 +88,17 @@ befs_check_sb(struct super_block *sb)
 		return BEFS_ERR;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * block_shift check added so that overflow does not
+	 * occur during the block_size check
+	 */
+
+	if (befs_sb->block_shift > BEFS_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT) {
+		befs_error(sb, "block_size too large. "
+			   "Corruption likely.");
+		return BEFS_ERR;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * block_shift and block_size encode the same information
 	 * in different ways as a consistency check.
-- 
2.37.2