[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230801132959.7c02e86f4c863f997226965a@hugovil.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:29:59 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
isaac.true@...onical.com, jesse.sung@...onical.com,
l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com, tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] serial: sc16is7xx: remove obsolete out_thread
label
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:53:10 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:23:35AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> >
> > Commit c8f71b49ee4d ("serial: sc16is7xx: setup GPIO controller later
> > in probe") moved GPIO setup code later in probe function. Doing so
> > also required to move ports cleanup code (out_ports label) after the
> > GPIO cleanup code.
> >
> > After these moves, the out_thread label becomes misplaced and makes
> > part of the cleanup code illogical.
> >
> > This patch remove the now obsolete out_thread label and make GPIO
> > setup code jump to out_ports label if it fails.
> >
> > Fixes: c8f71b49ee4d ("serial: sc16is7xx: setup GPIO controller later in probe")
> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>
> > Tested-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> Why is this not ok for stable kernels yet it has a Fixes: tag?
>
> Please fix.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi,
this is a somewhat particular case. It is a change that "fixes" some
previously unseen consequence in original commit, but that does not
result in any binary change in the end. That is why I decided not to
put in a "stable" tag.
If you want, maybe it would be simpler to remove the "Fixes" tag? I
originally put this tag to have a reference to the original commit, but
since it is already mentioned in the commit log message body, it can be
removed.
Hugo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists