linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: ufs-pci: Add support for QEMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9bb7ac58-db99-238f-0d2c-450470f05c74@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:20:48 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, jeuk20.kim@...sung.com
Cc:     "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "dlunev@...omium.org" <dlunev@...omium.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: ufs-pci: Add support for QEMU

On 8/1/23 04:12, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> I was really hoping for an explanation of "Why?" i.e.
> why does anyone want a virtual UFS device?  Why not use
> any existing virtual block device?

I hope this will enable testing of the UFS driver inside a virtual machine
on systems without UFS host controller. Jeuk, is that correct?

Thanks,

Bart.