[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9ab7525f048f3ce814d89f106947c34@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:18:29 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Remove the OV5642 entry
On 01/08/2023 18:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 06:10:52PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On 01/08/2023 17:47, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>
>> > Removing it without re-adding it elsewhere does not seem right, since
>> > there'll now be some undocumented compatibles in the tree, no?
>>
>> Currently, there is no ov5642 support in the kernel.
>
> It is present in devicetrees.
Yes, and none of them have the ov5642 camera functional:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx53-smd.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi
>> If someone adds the support for the ov5642 camera, then a specific
>> binding
>> will have to be created.
>>
>> I prefer to remove it from trivial-devices to avoid confusion.
>>
>> As is, it gives a false impression that ov5642 is supported and that
>> it
>> is a trivial device.
>
> The latter only do I agree with.
Care to explain how ov5642 is supported by the current mainline kernel?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists