linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Fix SNP CPUID requests to the hypervisor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9213337-65a6-c8ae-05d9-ca6838278597@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:31:57 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Fix SNP CPUID requests to the hypervisor

On 7/31/23 22:58, Dionna Amalie Glaze wrote:
>> Fixes: ee0bfa08a345 ("x86/compressed/64: Add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers")
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> 
> Nice catch.
> 
>> +static int __sev_cpuid_hv_ghcb(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt, struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
>> +{
>> +       u32 cr4 = native_read_cr4();
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, leaf->fn);
>> +       ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, leaf->subfn);
>> +
>> +       if (cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE)
>> +               /* Safe to read xcr0 */
>> +               ghcb_set_xcr0(ghcb, xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK));
>> +       else
>> +               /* xgetbv will cause #GP - use reset value for xcr0 */
>> +               ghcb_set_xcr0(ghcb, 1);
>> +
> 
> Everything looks good except I'm confused by this last comment. I
> thought xgetbv would #UD if OSXSAVE isn't set in cr4. Is that what
> happens after you set it to 1 as some kind of workaround?

Yes, after checking the APM, it would #UD. This code was copied from the 
existing CPUID #VC support. Not sure it requires a new version or if the 
maintainers could fix it up when applying.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> ....oh I think I do remember hitting this weird technicality when
> setting up CPUID support. I think it'd be helpful to document a little
> bit more why the ghcb's value is xcr0 is relevant at all when cr4's
> OSXSAVE bit is 0 though.
> 
>