linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: don't hand out write delegations on O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <169092877531.32308.10105992729094485900@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date:   Wed, 02 Aug 2023 08:26:15 +1000
From:   "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To:     "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        "Olga Kornievskaia" <kolga@...app.com>,
        "Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: don't hand out write delegations on O_WRONLY opens

On Tue, 01 Aug 2023, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I noticed that xfstests generic/001 was failing against linux-next nfsd.
> 
> The client would request a OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE open, and the server
> would hand out a write delegation. The client would then try to use that
> write delegation as the source stateid in a COPY or CLONE operation, and
> the server would respond with NFS4ERR_STALE.
> 
> The problem is that the struct file associated with the delegation does
> not necessarily have read permissions. It's handing out a write
> delegation on what is effectively an O_WRONLY open. RFC 8881 states:
> 
>  "An OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation allows the client to handle, on its
>   own, all opens."
> 
> Given that the client didn't request any read permissions, and that nfsd
> didn't check for any, it seems wrong to give out a write delegation.
> 
> Only hand out a write delegation if we have a O_RDWR descriptor
> available. If it fails to find an appropriate write descriptor, go
> ahead and try for a read delegation if NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ was
> requested.
> 
> This fixes xfstest generic/001.
> 
> Closes: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Rework the logic when finding struct file for the delegation. The
>   earlier patch might still have attached a O_WRONLY file to the deleg
>   in some cases, and could still have handed out a write delegation on
>   an O_WRONLY OPEN request in some cases.
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index ef7118ebee00..e79d82fd05e7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -5449,7 +5449,7 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>  	struct nfs4_file *fp = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
>  	struct nfs4_clnt_odstate *odstate = stp->st_clnt_odstate;
>  	struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> -	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> +	struct nfsd_file *nf = NULL;
>  	struct file_lock *fl;
>  	u32 dl_type;
>  
> @@ -5461,21 +5461,28 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>  	if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
>  
> -	if (open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE) {
> -		nf = find_writeable_file(fp);
> +	/*
> +	 * Try for a write delegation first. We need an O_RDWR file
> +	 * since a write delegation allows the client to perform any open
> +	 * from its cache.
> +	 */
> +	if ((open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) == NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) {
> +		nf = nfsd_file_get(fp->fi_fds[O_RDWR]);

This doesn't take fp->fi_lock before accessing ->fi_fds[], while the
find_readable_file() call below does.  This inconsistency suggests a
bug?

Maybe the provided API is awkward.  Should we have 
find_suitable_file() and find_suitable_file_locked()
that gets passed an nfs4_file and an O_MODE?
It tries the given mode, then O_RDWR

NeilBrown


>  		dl_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE;
> -	} else {
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the file is being opened O_RDONLY or we couldn't get a O_RDWR
> +	 * file for some reason, then try for a read deleg instead.
> +	 */
> +	if (!nf && (open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ)) {
>  		nf = find_readable_file(fp);
>  		dl_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ;
>  	}
> -	if (!nf) {
> -		/*
> -		 * We probably could attempt another open and get a read
> -		 * delegation, but for now, don't bother until the
> -		 * client actually sends us one.
> -		 */
> +
> +	if (!nf)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> -	}
> +
>  	spin_lock(&state_lock);
>  	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>  	if (nfs4_delegation_exists(clp, fp))
> 
> ---
> base-commit: a734662572708cf062e974f659ae50c24fc1ad17
> change-id: 20230731-wdeleg-bbdb6b25a3c6
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> 
>