[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308011631.BDCD5CE33A@keescook>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:33:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: cpu: refactor deprecated strncpy
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 09:14:56PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
>
> A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
> guarantees NUL-termination on its destination buffer argument which is
> _not_ the case for `strncpy`!
>
> The `sv_type` buffer is declared with a size of 16 which is then
> followed by some `strncpy` calls to populate the buffer with one of:
> "sv32", "sv57", "sv48", "sv39" or "none". Hard-coding the max length as 5 is
> error-prone and involves counting the number of characters (and
> hopefully not forgetting to count the NUL-byte) in the raw string.
>
> Using a pre-determined max length in combination with `strscpy` provides
> a cleaner, less error-prone as well as a less ambiguous implementation.
> `strscpy` guarantees that it's destination buffer is NUL-terminated even
> if it's source argument exceeds the max length as defined by the third
> argument.
>
> To be clear, there is no bug (i think?) in the current implementation
> but the current hard-coded values in combination with using a deprecated
> interface make this a worthwhile change, IMO.
>
> [1]: www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
> [2]: manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index a2fc952318e9..1c576e4ec171 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#define SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH 16
> +
> /*
> * Returns the hart ID of the given device tree node, or -ENODEV if the node
> * isn't an enabled and valid RISC-V hart node.
> @@ -271,21 +273,21 @@ static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f, const char *isa)
>
> static void print_mmu(struct seq_file *f)
> {
> - char sv_type[16];
> + char sv_type[SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH];
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv32", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv32", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> if (pgtable_l5_enabled)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv57", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv57", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> else if (pgtable_l4_enabled)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv48", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv48", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> else
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv39", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv39", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #endif
> #else
> - strncpy(sv_type, "none", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "none", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> seq_printf(f, "mmu\t\t: %s\n", sv_type);
> }
I'd say just throw the whole buffer away and just avoid copying the
.rodata strings onto the stack for no reason. They can be used directly:
static void print_mmu(struct seq_file *f)
{
const char *sv_type;
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
sv_type = "sv32";
#elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
if (pgtable_l5_enabled)
sv_type = "sv57";
else if (pgtable_l4_enabled)
sv_type = "sv48";
else
sv_type = "sv39";
#endif
#else
sv_type = "none";
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
seq_printf(f, "mmu\t\t: %s\n", sv_type);
}
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists