[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJXC0votVOBOK7KynVEt9Z5JzMpD22GKS0RJkh0vdrK4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:53:29 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: bpf: Only define get_proto_defrag_hook() if necessary
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 2:55 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
> Before, we were getting this warning:
>
> net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:32:1: warning: 'get_proto_defrag_hook' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> Guard the definition with CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV[4|6].
>
> Fixes: 91721c2d02d3 ("netfilter: bpf: Support BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG in netfilter link")
since that commit is in bpf-next only
please use [PATCH bpf-next] in the future to make sure BPF CI can test it.
I've applied it after manual testing, but very much prefer
the automation to do it for me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists