lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230801093620.ggz25g3faxycp44q@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:06:20 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     David Dai <davidai@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
        Gupta Pankaj <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver

On 31-07-23, 10:46, David Dai wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..66b0fd9b821c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Google LLC
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define REG_CUR_FREQ_OFFSET 0x0
> +#define REG_SET_FREQ_OFFSET 0x4
> +#define PER_CPU_OFFSET 0x8
> +
> +struct virt_cpufreq_ops {
> +	void (*set_freq)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u32 freq);
> +	u32 (*get_freq)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +};

Since you only have one implementation currently, this isn't really
required. Keep the data as NULL in `virt_cpufreq_match` and use
writel/readl directly.

This can be updated if we need more implementations later.

> +struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data {
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	const struct virt_cpufreq_ops *ops;
> +};
> +
> +static void virt_cpufreq_set_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u32 freq)
> +{
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> +
> +	writel_relaxed(freq, data->base + policy->cpu * PER_CPU_OFFSET
> +			+ REG_SET_FREQ_OFFSET);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 virt_cpufreq_get_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> +
> +	return readl_relaxed(data->base + policy->cpu * PER_CPU_OFFSET
> +			+ REG_CUR_FREQ_OFFSET);

This doesn't look properly aligned. Please run checkpatch (--strict
(optional)).

> +}
> +
> +static const struct virt_cpufreq_ops virt_freq_ops = {
> +	.set_freq = virt_cpufreq_set_freq,
> +	.get_freq = virt_cpufreq_get_freq,
> +};
> +
> +static void virt_scale_freq_tick(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(smp_processor_id());
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> +	u32 max_freq = (u32)policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +	u64 cur_freq;
> +	u64 scale;
> +
> +	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +
> +	cur_freq = (u64)data->ops->get_freq(policy);
> +	cur_freq <<= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
> +	scale = div_u64(cur_freq, max_freq);
> +
> +	this_cpu_write(arch_freq_scale, (unsigned long)scale);
> +}
> +
> +static struct scale_freq_data virt_sfd = {
> +	.source = SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_VIRT,
> +	.set_freq_scale = virt_scale_freq_tick,
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned int virt_cpufreq_set_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> +	/*
> +	 * Use cached frequency to avoid rounding to freq table entries
> +	 * and undo 25% frequency boost applied by schedutil.
> +	 */
> +	u32 freq = mult_frac(policy->cached_target_freq, 80, 100);
> +
> +	data->ops->set_freq(policy, freq);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int virt_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		unsigned int target_freq)
> +{
> +	virt_cpufreq_set_perf(policy);
> +	return target_freq;
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		unsigned int index)
> +{
> +	return virt_cpufreq_set_perf(policy);
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *drv_data = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
> +	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
> +	struct device *cpu_dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
> +	if (!cpu_dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> +	if (ret <= 0) {
> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "OPP table can't be empty\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &table);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	policy->freq_table = table;
> +	policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = false;

Why can't we call virt_cpufreq_target_index() from any CPU ?

> +	policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
> +	policy->driver_data = drv_data;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only takes effect if another FIE source such as AMUs
> +	 * have not been registered.
> +	 */
> +	topology_set_scale_freq_source(&virt_sfd, policy->cpus);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	topology_clear_scale_freq_source(SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_VIRT, policy->related_cpus);
> +	kfree(policy->freq_table);
> +	policy->freq_table = NULL;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	/* Nothing to restore. */
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +	/* Dummy offline() to avoid exit() being called and freeing resources. */
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_virt_driver = {
> +	.name		= "virt-cpufreq",
> +	.init		= virt_cpufreq_cpu_init,
> +	.exit		= virt_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
> +	.online         = virt_cpufreq_online,
> +	.offline        = virt_cpufreq_offline,
> +	.verify		= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> +	.target_index	= virt_cpufreq_target_index,
> +	.fast_switch	= virt_cpufreq_fast_switch,
> +	.attr		= cpufreq_generic_attr,
> +};
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct virt_cpufreq_drv_data *drv_data;
> +
> +	drv_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!drv_data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	drv_data->ops = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!drv_data->ops)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	drv_data->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(drv_data->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(drv_data->base);
> +
> +	cpufreq_virt_driver.driver_data = drv_data;
> +
> +	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_virt_driver);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Virtual CPUFreq driver failed to register: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Virtual CPUFreq driver initialized\n");
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virt_cpufreq_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpufreq_virt_driver);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id virt_cpufreq_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "virtual,cpufreq", .data = &virt_freq_ops},
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, virt_cpufreq_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver virt_cpufreq_driver = {
> +	.probe = virt_cpufreq_driver_probe,
> +	.remove = virt_cpufreq_driver_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "virt-cpufreq",
> +		.of_match_table = virt_cpufreq_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init virt_cpufreq_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&virt_cpufreq_driver);
> +}
> +postcore_initcall(virt_cpufreq_init);

Why do you want to use this and not module_init() ? Then you can
simply use `module_platform_driver()`.

> +
> +static void __exit virt_cpufreq_exit(void)
> +{
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&virt_cpufreq_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(virt_cpufreq_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtual cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ