linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] watchdog: Add a new struct for Amlogic-GXBB driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 20:51:30 +0800
From:   Huqiang Qin <huqiang.qin@...ogic.com>
To:     Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        jbrunet@...libre.com, martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] watchdog: Add a new struct for Amlogic-GXBB driver

Hi Dmitry,

On 2023/7/28 15:15, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hello Huqiang,
> 
> Thank you for the patch series!
> 
> Please include a cover letter in future patch submissions if possible.
> It will help to better understand the theme of the patch series and
> group all patch sets together in one email thread.

Thank you for your suggestion. In fact, this patch series contains
a cover letter. It may be due to network reasons that it was not
sent to your mailbox correctly :)

...
>>  static int meson_gxbb_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
>>  {
>>       struct meson_gxbb_wdt *data = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev);
>> @@ -140,8 +143,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops meson_gxbb_wdt_pm_ops = {
>>       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(meson_gxbb_wdt_suspend, meson_gxbb_wdt_resume)
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct wdt_params gxbb_params = {
>> +     .rst_shift = 21,
> 
> Maybe it's better to declare rst with the BIT() macro already applied,
> and use it in wdt_probe() as is. And name 'rst' without 'shift' is
> looking more brief.

Okay, I will change it in the next version.


Thanks

Best Regards,
Huqiang Qin