[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD8CoPBb7-j7RLggWfu+Y-bmb_VW_0O46MyH35vWL=24C3Tndw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 21:08:54 +0800
From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched, tracing: add to report task state in
symbolic chars
Sorry that I don't get this one, did you mean kernel subsystems like
bpf or third party modules? Honestly I don't know how it works here
for userspace to consume the raw tracepoint without looking at
tracefs.
Regards,
Ze
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:46 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:01:21PM +0800, Ze Gao wrote:
> > @@ -233,6 +255,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
> > __field( pid_t, prev_pid )
> > __field( int, prev_prio )
> > __field( long, prev_state )
> > + __field( char, prev_state_char )
> > __array( char, next_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
> > __field( pid_t, next_pid )
> > __field( int, next_prio )
>
> And this again will wreck everybody that consumes the raw tracepoint
> without looking at tracefs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists