[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7jpa4g4.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 08:45:15 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hyun Kwon <hyun.kwon@...inx.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/37] drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp: Use correct kerneldoc
formatting in zynqmp_disp
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> writes:
> I haven't seen anything either. I tried moving the documentation inline,
> and the scripts/kernel-doc script ignores the comment blocks for the
> inner fields.
>
> Mauro, Jon, is this a known issue ? If so, are there plans to fix it ?
> What's the recommended way to proceed here ?
As far as I can recall, nobody has ever complained about problems with
nested structure definitions like that; kernel-doc certainly isn't set
up to handle such a thing. It could certainly be added, but it would
require somebody diving into that delightful code to do that work. I
can't promise to be able to do that in the near future.
Sorry,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists