linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/bridge: lt9611: Do not generate HFP/HBP/HSA and EOT packet"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5597c50-d41c-9f7e-fb85-4e4a1bc29f15@denx.de>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 20:45:21 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/bridge: lt9611: Do not generate HFP/HBP/HSA
 and EOT packet"

On 8/2/23 20:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 20:34, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/2/23 15:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 02/08/2023 11:52, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit [1] to fix display regression on the Dragonboard 845c
>>>> (SDM845) devboard.
>>>>
>>>> There's a mismatch on the real action of the following flags:
>>>> - MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HSA
>>>> - MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HFP
>>>> - MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HBP
>>>> which leads to a non-working display on qcom platforms.
>>>>
>>>> [1] 8ddce13ae696 ("drm/bridge: lt9611: Do not generate HFP/HBP/HSA and
>>>> EOT packet")
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>>> Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
>>>> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>>>> Fixes: 8ddce13ae69 ("drm/bridge: lt9611: Do not generate HFP/HBP/HSA
>>>> and EOT packet")
>>>> Reported-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
>>>> Link:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAMi1Hd0TD=2z_=bcDrht3H_wiLvAFcv8Z-U_r_KUOoeMc6UMjw@mail.gmail.com/
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c | 4 +---
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> #fix db845c
>>>
>>> The boards broken by [1] are used in production by different parties
>>> since 5.10, breaking them doesn't seem more acceptable than breaking the
>>> new out-of-tree iMX8m hardware.
>>
>> The MX8M is also in-tree, so this does not apply.
> 
> v6.5-rc4:
> 
> $ git grep lontium,lt9611 | grep -v 9611uxc
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:$id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:
>      - lontium,lt9611
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:
>        compatible = "lontium,lt9611";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts: compatible = "lontium,lt9611";
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c: { "lontium,lt9611", 0 },
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c: { .compatible = "lontium,lt9611" },
> 
> next-20230802:
> 
> $ git grep lontium,lt9611 | grep -v 9611uxc
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:$id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:
>      - lontium,lt9611
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt9611.yaml:
>        compatible = "lontium,lt9611";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts: compatible = "lontium,lt9611";
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c: { "lontium,lt9611", 0 },
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c: { .compatible = "lontium,lt9611" },
> 
> Your device is not in the tree. Your commit broke existing users.

These devices are in tree:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-data-modul-edm-sbc.dts
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-data-modul-edm-sbc.dts

The LT9211 and LT9611 are both expansion modules handled by DTOs and 
bound to the DSIM (which is also in tree).

> Can we please end the argument, land the fix (this revert) for 6.5 and
> work on the solution for 6.6 or 6.7?

I would much prefer a solution which does not break my existing use 
case. It is still not even clear whether the problem really is on MX8M 
side at all, or whether it is QCOM misinterpreting flags. I cannot debug 
the later, since I have no access to that platform, nor its documentation.