linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Explicitly include correct DT includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 07:47:07 +0300
From:   claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Explicitly include correct DT includes



On 18.07.2023 01:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it was merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
> 
> A couple of other includes are unused and can be dropped too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Applied to at91-soc, thanks!