[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505c6b25-d9e8-d7b3-1a0d-2b51e45fb66a@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 06:37:47 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform
device for TRBE
On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>>
>> #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
>
> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?
Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming
scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with
SPE here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists