| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 17:08:55 -0700
From: Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
Ian Lin <ian.lin@...ineon.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Prasanna Kerekoppa <prasanna.kerekoppa@...ress.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ramesh Rangavittal <ramesh.rangavittal@...ineon.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Ryohei Kondo <ryohei.kondo@...ress.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Brian Henriquez <brian.henriquez@...ress.com>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, petr@...arici.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] wifi: brcm80211: drop struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:57 AM Petr Tesarik
<petrtesarik@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/2023 5:36 PM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>
> >
> > The 'S' scan method is not implemented. The type member is always written
> > as 'E' and never read. Consequently, struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le can be
> > replaced with struct brcmf_escan_params_le.
>
> Seeing that Hans has already fixed the actual issue with the flex array,
> this whole series is not needed.
>
> But maybe this simplification has some value on its own?
I don't think this change would work.
> Petr T
>
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c | 38 ++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> > index d4492d02e4ea..915f95760470 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c
> > @@ -123,23 +123,6 @@ enum brcmf_p2p_disc_state {
> > WL_P2P_DISC_ST_SEARCH
> > };
> >
> > -/**
> > - * struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le - P2P specific scan request.
> > - *
> > - * @type: type of scan method requested (values: 'E' or 'S').
> > - * @reserved: reserved (ignored).
> > - * @eparams: parameters used for type 'E'.
> > - * @sparams: parameters used for type 'S'.
> > - */
> > -struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le {
> > - u8 type;
> > - u8 reserved[3];
> > - union {
> > - struct brcmf_escan_params_le eparams;
> > - struct brcmf_scan_params_le sparams;
> > - };
> > -};
> > -
> > /**
> > * struct brcmf_p2p_pub_act_frame - WiFi P2P Public Action Frame
> > *
> > @@ -646,14 +629,14 @@ static s32 brcmf_p2p_escan(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u32 num_chans,
> > {
> > struct brcmf_pub *drvr = p2p->cfg->pub;
> > s32 ret = 0;
> > - s32 memsize = offsetof(struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le,
> > - eparams.params_le.channel_list);
> > + s32 memsize = offsetof(struct brcmf_escan_params_le,
> > + params_le.channel_list);
> > s32 nprobes;
> > s32 active;
> > u32 i;
> > u8 *memblk;
> > struct brcmf_cfg80211_vif *vif;
> > - struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le *p2p_params;
> > + struct brcmf_escan_params_le *eparams;
> > struct brcmf_scan_params_le *sparams;
> >
> > memsize += num_chans * sizeof(__le16);
> > @@ -667,8 +650,8 @@ static s32 brcmf_p2p_escan(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u32 num_chans,
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto exit;
> > }
> > - p2p_params = (struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le *)memblk;
> > - sparams = &p2p_params->eparams.params_le;
> > + eparams = (struct brcmf_escan_params_le *)memblk;
> > + sparams = &eparams->params_le;
> >
> > switch (search_state) {
> > case WL_P2P_DISC_ST_SEARCH:
> > @@ -698,11 +681,6 @@ static s32 brcmf_p2p_escan(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u32 num_chans,
> >
> > brcmf_p2p_set_discover_state(vif->ifp, search_state, 0, 0);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * set p2p scan parameters.
> > - */
> > - p2p_params->type = 'E';
> > -
> > /* determine the scan engine parameters */
> > sparams->bss_type = DOT11_BSSTYPE_ANY;
> > sparams->scan_type = BRCMF_SCANTYPE_ACTIVE;
> > @@ -747,9 +725,9 @@ static s32 brcmf_p2p_escan(struct brcmf_p2p_info *p2p, u32 num_chans,
> > sparams->channel_list[i] = cpu_to_le16(chanspecs[i]);
> >
> > /* set the escan specific parameters */
> > - p2p_params->eparams.version = cpu_to_le32(BRCMF_ESCAN_REQ_VERSION);
> > - p2p_params->eparams.action = cpu_to_le16(WL_ESCAN_ACTION_START);
> > - p2p_params->eparams.sync_id = cpu_to_le16(0x1234);
> > + eparams->version = cpu_to_le32(BRCMF_ESCAN_REQ_VERSION);
> > + eparams->action = cpu_to_le16(WL_ESCAN_ACTION_START);
> > + eparams->sync_id = cpu_to_le16(0x1234);
> > /* perform p2p scan on primary device */
> > ret = brcmf_fil_bsscfg_data_set(vif->ifp, "p2p_scan", memblk, memsize);
Firmware is expecting struct brcmf_p2p_scan_le as the parameter for
"p2p_scan" iovar.
Regards,
- Franky
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4203 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists