[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230802080544.3239967-1-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 16:05:45 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de,
kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com,
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com
Cc: bfields@...ldses.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: lockd: avoid possible wrong NULL parameter
clang's static analysis warning: fs/lockd/mon.c: line 293, column 2:
Null pointer passed as 2nd argument to memory copy function.
Assuming 'hostname' is NULL and calling 'nsm_create_handle()', this will
pass NULL as 2nd argument to memory copy function 'memcpy()'. So return
NULL if 'hostname' is invalid.
Fixes: 77a3ef33e2de ("NSM: More clean up of nsm_get_handle()")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
fs/lockd/mon.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/mon.c b/fs/lockd/mon.c
index 1d9488cf0534..eebab013e063 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/mon.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/mon.c
@@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ struct nsm_handle *nsm_get_handle(const struct net *net,
spin_unlock(&nsm_lock);
+ if (!hostname)
+ return NULL;
+
new = nsm_create_handle(sap, salen, hostname, hostname_len);
if (unlikely(new == NULL))
return NULL;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists