linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] tools: lib: perf: Implement riscv mmap support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230802-11f1b3d1ff4cc987bb58bfa4@orel>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:29:05 +0300
From:   Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To:     Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] tools: lib: perf: Implement riscv mmap support

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> riscv now supports mmaping hardware counters so add what's needed to
> take advantage of that in libperf.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/perf/mmap.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> index 0d1634cedf44..2184814b37dd 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,72 @@ static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
>  
>  static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return read_sysreg(cntvct_el0); }
>  
> +/* __riscv_xlen contains the witdh of the native base integer, here 64-bit */
> +#elif defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64
> +
> +/* TODO: implement rv32 support */

It'd be easy to implement the rv32 support now (even if it's premature for
use), in order to avoid the TODO (which will likely be forgotten). I think
we just need to drop the __riscv_xlen == 64 above and then extend the
csr_read() macro something like the untested code below. (I'm not sure if
a TODO or premature, likely untested, code is worse though.)

> +
> +#define CSR_CYCLE	0xc00
> +#define CSR_TIME	0xc01
> +
> +#define csr_read(csr)						\
> +({								\

u64 __value;

> +	register unsigned long __v;				\
> +		__asm__ __volatile__ ("csrr %0, %1"		\
> +		 : "=r" (__v)					\
> +		 : "i" (csr) : );				\

__value = __v;

#if __riscv_xlen == 32
{
  int csrh = (csr) - CSR_CYCLE + CSR_CYCLEH;

  __asm__ __volatile__ ("csrr %0, %1" : "=r" (__v) : "i" (csrh));
  __value |= (u64)__v << 32;
}
#endif

__value;

> +})
> +
> +static unsigned long csr_read_num(int csr_num)

static u64 csr_read_num(int csr_num)

> +{
> +#define switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num, __val)           {\
> +	case __csr_num:                                 \
> +		__val = csr_read(__csr_num);            \
> +		break; }
> +#define switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num, __val)         {\
> +	switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num + 0, __val)        \
> +	switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num + 1, __val)}
> +#define switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num, __val)         {\
> +	switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num + 0, __val)      \
> +	switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num + 2, __val)}
> +#define switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num, __val)         {\
> +	switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num + 0, __val)      \
> +	switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num + 4, __val)}
> +#define switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num, __val)        {\
> +	switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num + 0, __val)      \
> +	switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num + 8, __val)}
> +#define switchcase_csr_read_32(__csr_num, __val)        {\
> +	switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num + 0, __val)     \
> +	switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num + 16, __val)}
> +
> +	unsigned long ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (csr_num) {
> +	switchcase_csr_read_32(CSR_CYCLE, ret)
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read_32
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read_16
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read_8
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read_4
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read_2
> +#undef switchcase_csr_read
> +}
> +
> +static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
> +{
> +	return csr_read_num(CSR_CYCLE + counter);
> +}
> +
> +static u64 read_timestamp(void)
> +{
> +	return csr_read_num(CSR_TIME);
> +}
> +
>  #else
>  static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter __maybe_unused) { return 0; }
>  static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return 0; }
> -- 
> 2.39.2
>

Thanks,
drew