[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMpKYfNWA/jNgEuL@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 13:21:53 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: migrate: use a folio in add_page_for_migration()
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:53:43PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> err = -EACCES;
> - if (page_mapcount(page) > 1 && !migrate_all)
> - goto out_putpage;
> + if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) > 1 && !migrate_all)
> + goto out_putfolio;
I do not think this is the correct change. Maybe leave this line
alone.
> - if (PageHuge(page)) {
> - if (PageHead(page)) {
> - isolated = isolate_hugetlb(page_folio(page), pagelist);
> + if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> + if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
This makes no sense when you read it. All hugetlb folios are large,
by definition. Think about what this code used to do, and what it
should be changed to.
> + isolated = isolate_hugetlb(folio, pagelist);
> err = isolated ? 1 : -EBUSY;
> }
> } else {
> - struct page *head;
> -
> - head = compound_head(page);
> - isolated = isolate_lru_page(head);
> + isolated = folio_isolate_lru(folio);
> if (!isolated) {
> err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out_putpage;
> + goto out_putfolio;
> }
>
> err = 1;
> - list_add_tail(&head->lru, pagelist);
> - mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
> - NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(head),
> - thp_nr_pages(head));
> + list_add_tail(&folio->lru, pagelist);
> + node_stat_mod_folio(folio,
> + NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(folio),
> + folio_nr_pages(folio));
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists