[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb374ec4-3dfa-42f1-dffb-fc8505625b73@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:43:25 +0530
From: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PMIC pm7550ba dtsi
On 8/2/2023 6:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 2.08.2023 11:59, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add dtsi for PMIC pm7550ba found in Qualcomm platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> Subject: "PMIC pm7550ba" -> "pm7550ba PMIC"
>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> + pm7550ba_eusb2_repeater: phy@...0 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
> A new compatible should be introduced, so that it goes like this:
>
> compatible = "qcom,pm7550ba-eusb2-repeater", "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
Just a doubt, Since the compatible can be same why we need to introduce
a new compatible.
Should every soc have a compatible string?
Thanks,
Rohit.
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists