[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230802132431.254614419@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:24:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: anna-maria@...utronix.de, rafael@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
frederic@...nel.org, gautham.shenoy@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, kajetan.puchalski@....com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] cpuidle,teo: Improve TEO vs NOHZ
Patches attempting to solve the TEO tick/nohz vs timer-pull issue.
Very lightly tested..
Since last time:
- 'split' tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()
- replaced the tick heuristic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists