lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874c28aa-63da-df09-e44d-c6079771606b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 07:17:45 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/225] 6.1.43-rc2 review

On 8/3/23 00:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 04:18:19PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 09:41:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.43 release.
>>> There are 225 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 04 Aug 2023 06:54:28 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 521 pass: 519 fail: 2
>> Failed tests:
>> 	arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:rootfs
>> 	arm:bletchley-bmc,fmc-model=mt25qu02g,spi-model=mt25qu02g:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd256:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:rootfs
>>
>> The failed tests crash while attempting to boot from a f2fs root file
>> system, suggesting that f2fs support may be broken.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know.  I've now dropped the f2fs patches from this
> queue.
> 

Confirmed that v6.1.43 does not have the problem.

Thanks,
Guenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ