[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803144548.qfis7z4eoaz5h6oy@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:45:48 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>,
Maxim Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/10] net: ptp: create a mock-up PTP
Hardware Clock driver
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 02:58:24PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mock_phc_lock);
> > +
>
> Not a big deal, but as it is possible to have multiple netdevsim
> instances (is it?), I think it's better to move the lock inside struct
> mock_phc.
Ok. I'll respin with this and Kurt's comments addressed. I'll wait for a
little bit longer, in case there are more change requests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists